UN tribunal rejects Myanmar opposition to Rohingya genocide case

The decision paves the way for hearings that will examine evidence of alleged atrocities against the Rohingya Muslim minority in a Buddhist-majority country.

On July 22, protesters outside The Hague marched on an image of Myanmar’s military leader Min Aung Hlaing. (AP)

The UN’s top court has ruled that a landmark case accusing military-ruled Myanmar of genocide against the Rohingya Muslim minority can go ahead.

The International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague on Friday dismissed all of Myanmar’s objections to a case brought by the West African nation of The Gambia in 2019.

The ruling paves the way for full court hearings into allegations of a bloody crackdown on the Rohingya in 2017 by Buddhist-majority Myanmar.

“The tribunal considers that it has jurisdiction (…) to hear the request filed by the Republic of The Gambia, and that the request is admissible,” said ICJ President Joan Donoghue.

Gambia’s Justice Minister Dawda Jallow told reporters outside the court that he was “very happy that the court has done justice”.

Several dozen Rohingya activists protested outside the court as the judgment was read.

READ MORE: Rohingyas praise US for acknowledging their genocide in Myanmar

“Big Moment for Justice”

“This decision is a great moment for justice for the Rohingya, and for all Burmese,” said Tun Khin, president of the Burmese Rohingya Organization UK, referring to the country by its former name.

“We are happy that this historic genocide trial can finally begin in earnest.”

Myanmar’s representative, Attorney General Thida Oo, said her country was now “looking forward to finding the best way to protect our people and our country”.

The Gambia filed a lawsuit in November 2019, alleging Myanmar’s treatment of the Rohingya violated the 1948 UN Genocide Convention.

Myanmar had argued on several grounds that the tribunal lacked jurisdiction in the matter and that it should dismiss the case while it was still in its preliminary stages.

But the judges unanimously rejected Myanmar’s argument that The Gambia was acting as an “agent” of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation of 57 countries in the case.

Only states, not organizations, are allowed to bring cases to the ICJ, which has adjudicated disputes between countries since just after World War II.

READ MORE: Myanmar Rohingyas sue Facebook for enabling ‘genocide’

“Brutality and Cruelty”

They also unanimously rejected Myanmar’s claims that The Gambia could not bring a case because it was not a direct party to the alleged genocide and that Myanmar had withdrawn from a relevant part of the convention. on the genocide.

Finally, they rejected by 15-1 Myanmar’s contention that there was no formal dispute at the time The Gambia filed the case, and therefore the tribunal lacked jurisdiction.

Hundreds of thousands of members of the Rohingya minority fled the Southeast Asian country during the operation five years ago, bringing with them harrowing reports of murder, rape and arson.

About 850,000 Rohingya languish in camps in neighboring Bangladesh while another 600,000 Rohingya remain in Myanmar’s southwestern Rakhine state.

READ MORE: US Says Myanmar Army Committed Genocide Against Rohingya Muslims

Source: AFP

Comments are closed.